<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="todaycom/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are the Denver Broncos better that average?</title>
	<link>http://sportsfanatic.today.com/2008/07/31/are-teh-denver-broncos-better-that-average/</link>
	<description>The views of one SportsFanatic.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://www.today.com/version-2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: danniboi33</title>
		<link>http://sportsfanatic.today.com/2008/07/31/are-teh-denver-broncos-better-that-average/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>danniboi33</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 15:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sportsfanatic.today.com/2008/07/31/are-teh-denver-broncos-better-that-average/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Jim, I understand what you are spelling out, but to me, we are talking of the unproven. I have been wrong before, but I do not think this is one of those times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, I understand what you are spelling out, but to me, we are talking of the unproven. I have been wrong before, but I do not think this is one of those times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


